Pac Vs Bradley: Who Won? Vote And Discuss.
ROCKYMARSHMELLOW
10 Jun 2012
Boricuahook, on 10 June 2012 - 01:45 AM, said:
Two totally different fights, IMO. Bradley connected way more than Mosley. Did some good damage to the body and had Pacquiao throwing much less than I've seen him. I saw a horrible performance by Pac, honestly. And I am a Pac fan. The thing is Bradley also looked like crap, but he was much more competitive than what people and media make it to be.
No he wasn't. How long have you been watching boxing, about a month ?
1hitrquitr
10 Jun 2012
Boricuahook, on 10 June 2012 - 01:45 AM, said:
Two totally different fights, IMO. Bradley connected way more than Mosley. Did some good damage to the body and had Pacquiao throwing much less than I've seen him. I saw a horrible performance by Pac, honestly. And I am a Pac fan. The thing is Bradley also looked like crap, but he was much more competitive than what people and media make it to be.
He showed his competitive spirit but the fight wasn't competitive. Bradley backed up most of the fight and PAC had to follow him lot.
Boricuahook
10 Jun 2012
Bourne
10 Jun 2012
^
compubox doesnt agree with you. pac landed more the last 4 rounds.
compubox doesnt agree with you. pac landed more the last 4 rounds.
Boricuahook
10 Jun 2012
Bourne, on 10 June 2012 - 02:01 AM, said:
^
compubox doesnt agree with you. pac landed more the last 4 rounds.
compubox doesnt agree with you. pac landed more the last 4 rounds.
You should be watching more how the fight goes instead of relying on the fatally flawed Compubox. Like I said....Pac won 6 rounds in my eyes, and lost the other 6. What happened is that people got carried away with how dominant was Pac in those rounds he won. But boxing isn't about how profoundly you win some rounds. Boxing is about how much rounds you win. I thought Bradley did enough to win at least 6 rounds of that fight. Many of Pac's punches landed on air and gloves. A lot of Bradley's shots were HARD body shots. Apparently, people don't count bodyshots in boxing. That's too sad. There is a reason why Pac was so lamely inactive in this fight, and it has a lot to do with the body work. Bradley deserves much more credit than he is getting.....and Pac would get badly outclassed by Floyd. This comes from a Pac fan, but I feel Pac is totally past it. This has showed in his last 2 fights.
mistermetaj
10 Jun 2012
Pac won at worse 10 rounds to 2. This fight wasn't even close. This is a travesty greater than Lewis-Holyfield, Briggs-Foreman, and De La Hoya-Trinidad. What a disgraceful sport.
diamondsmuggler
10 Jun 2012
Boricuahook, on 10 June 2012 - 02:09 AM, said:
You should be watching more how the fight goes instead of relying on the fatally flawed Compubox. Like I said....Pac won 6 rounds in my eyes, and lost the other 6. What happened is that people got carried away with how dominant was Pac in those rounds he won. But boxing isn't about how profoundly you win some rounds. Boxing is about how much rounds you win. I thought Bradley did enough to win at least 6 rounds of that fight. Many of Pac's punches landed on air and gloves. A lot of Bradley's shots were HARD body shots. Apparently, people don't count bodyshots in boxing. That's too sad. There is a reason why Pac was so lamely inactive in this fight, and it has a lot to do with the body work. Bradley deserves much more credit than he is getting.....and Pac would get badly outclassed by Floyd. This comes from a Pac fan, but I feel Pac is totally past it. This has showed in his last 2 fights.
sad but true.
I thought pacquiao won easily but he looked like absolute garbage. it's time for him to retire. under no circumstances should he even entertain the idea of the floyd fight.
Hemorrhoid Katrina
10 Jun 2012
1hitrquitr, on 10 June 2012 - 01:12 AM, said:
I'll predictmDarth Kong will be the only one to vote Bradley even for those who dislike PAC, I think the animosity towards crooked judges is greater.
Dude, truthfully I thought pac lost. I saw a close fight that I thought bradley had won, but I figured honestly pac was going to get the decision. Especially because lederman had it a landlside for pacquaio.( which didn't make sense). When the decision was announced I knew there would be a lot of unhappy customers. But all in all, bradley withstood everything and mounted the best offense that he could while maintaining a great defense. She slipped and dodged mostly everything pac threw rather impressionally
linkpeso
10 Jun 2012
linkpeso
10 Jun 2012
9secondko
10 Jun 2012
Boxingfan32, on 10 June 2012 - 03:37 AM, said:
Good to be honest... I can't go along with that though. I knew Tim would be tough and would move alot. IF he would have fought the entire fight like he fought the last 2 or 3 rounds, he would have easily won IMO... but he just wanted to show he could take punches ... and he did that, but he lost a lot of rounds because of it.
You didn't even see the fight. Bradley won two rounds.
Not even close to looking like he could have won no matter what he did.
Pacquaio totally clowned Bradley.
Tim knows it too.
He wants to believe he earned it. But when he watches the tapes, he'll feel like a puppet.
9secondko
10 Jun 2012
Boxingfan32, on 10 June 2012 - 03:46 AM, said:
manny gets blown out by Floyd... we've all known that for a long time... well except for 9secondgayho. I don't mean Bradley is that guy... manny gets sweet talked into a rematch that he will IMO lose because this time Bradley wouldn't be so dumb to fight manny's fight and will actually box and move like he should have the entire fight and then manny retires... enter Floyd who wouldn't be to worried about Tim's punching... he loses, arum still makes a lot of money and then arum turns his attention to Alvarez and Chavez and protecting them for a few years.
Outside of corrupt judging, the PAC that "lost" to Bradley beats the Floyd that "beat" Cotto.
Let's be real here.
