QUOTE(tobyh5 @ Apr 24 2006, 03:48 AM)
i am saying that vitali is calling out a retired boxer who is retired, said he was retired and is from the previous era, whereas Lewis was called out by Tyson, an active fighter from the same generation and it is not lewis business whether tyson was interested etc etc, fact is Tyson was active, ranked, calling him out, public demanded it, and so it happened.
Not even close to vitali calling out Lewis, a fighter who he caught at an advanced age, from the previous generation who happens to have earned his stripes and retired.
Oh, and btw, you are aware of course that Lennox beat Vitali right? Oh, of course, Vitali hurt Lewis in the second round, and so that means he won the fight doesnt it because history has never shown a fighter to be stunned in a round and come back to win anyway has it?
You know, thats all it takes to win a bout isnt it, stun the other guy in one of the rounds, and bollox to the rest of the fight. You are aware the object of the exercise is to either outpoint the other fella, (do better in more rounds) or to prevent the other guy from reaching the final bell. This can be done by either knocking him on the floor for a count of 10, beating him so bad the fight is stopped or inflicting cuts on him so severe, the fight must also be stopped.
Unless i am mistaken, lewis achieved this, whether he was puffing or not is irrelevant, how do you know that he didnt realise fight was probably only going another couple rounds, so instead of conserving energy he decided to throw caution to the wind and engage him harder for a shorter (winning) period.
You did happen to notice that after the second round big ole vitali was walking backwards, throwing solid shots true, but also solid shots that lennox began to walk through enabling him to inflict further fight stopping injuries
I cannot pretend I would know the outcome of that fight if that cut hadn't happened. LL won fair and square. In my opinion, watching the fight I thought Vitali was the better man that night.
What I do know are facts. You seem to be missing the point on alot of issues in regards to Tyson that I clearly explained. You either ignored them, or you just can't process information effectively.
Tyson was a circus show after the Holyfield fights. Everything he did after that showed he was just looking for attention and a payday. The more attention he got, the better hispayday would be. Tyson was a smart promoter. He played a character. I know someone who was close to Tyson at one point of his life. He was a very weird fellow and very unsure of himself. He truly played a character when he said he wanted to eat Lewis's children as evidenced by the fact he was without child, therfore Tyson was using that as a symbol rather than to be taken literally by all the uneducated folk who mostly follows boxing unfortunately. He knew what he was doing although very irrational and ridiculous.
Here is what I am saying. TYSON WAS NOT A REAL FIGHTER AFTER 1997 OR AFTER THE BITE FIGHT. HE WAS JUST TRYING FOR A PAYDAY EITHER AGAINST EVANDER OR WHOEVER WAS CHAMP. LENNOX BECAME CHAMP AND WAS THE BIG PAYDAY. TYSON HUNG ON TO GET THAT PAYDAY BY STAYING ACTIVE AGAINST HAND PICKED CANNON FODDER. HE TRAINED IN HAWAAII FOR PETE SAKE TO GET IN SHAPE FOR THE HEAYWEIGHT CHAMPION. USE COMMON SENSE BUDDY, STOP LYING TO YOURSELF AND GET OVER THE FACT THAT TYSON ACTUALLY THOUGHT HE HAD A CHANCE AGAINST LEWIS OR ANY OTHER CHAMPION THAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN AT THAT TIME. TYSONS PRIME WAS 1988. LENNOX LEWIS WAS AT HIS PEAK IN 1998. 10 YEARS APART!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AGE MEANS NOTHING WHEN YOU FIGHT AT DIFFERENT LEVELS IN A CARREER. LENNOX FOUGHT AND LOST IN THE 1984 OLYMPICS TO BIGGS. HE THEN STAYED AN AMATUER ANOTHER 4 YEARS WHILE TYSON WAS BECOMING THE BEST IN THE WORLD ALONG WITH EVANDER. WHEN LL TURNED PRO, TYSON WAS ONE OFF THE ALL TIME GREATS ACCORDING TO SOME , AND EVANDER WAS THE POUND FOR POUND KING AS UNDISPUTED CRUISERWEIGHT CHAMP WHO TURNED HEAYWEIGHT. LENNOX SKIPPED AN ERA ENTIRELY WHEN HE DID NOT TURN PRO IN 1985. HE HAD MUCH LESS WEAR AND TEAR ON HIM AND HAD MUCH MORE MOTIVATION LATER IN THOSE YEARS BECAUSE HE HAD NOT ACCOMPLISHED HIMSELF LIKE HOLYFIELD DID FROM 1987 TO 1997, AND TYSON FROM 1986 TO 1991. LENNOX MADE HIS BONES FROM 1996-2002. VITALI WAS WBO CHAMP IN 1997 AND THEREFORE HE WAS AS MUCH IN LENNOX'S ERA AS LENNOX WAS IN EVANDER'S AND TYSON'S ERA. VITALI HAD A RIGHT TO PROVE HIMSELF AGAINST LENNOX BECAUSE LENNOX CAME IN LATE IN THE PRO'S. HE WAS THE SAME AGE AS TYSON , BUT THEY WERE AGES APART IN BOXING YEARS. EVANDER WAS 5 YEARS OLDER THAN LENNOX WHEN THEY FOUGHT, AND LENNOX WAS 4 OR 5 YEARS OLDER THAN VITALI, SO IT IS ALL RELEVANT.
YOU DEFEND LEWIS SO MUCH IT REALLY BEGS THE QUESTION AS HOW TRULY GOOD WAS LENNOX LEWIS? HE NEVER BEAT A GREAT FIGHTER IN THEIR PRIME EXCEPT VITALI, AND I DON'T KNOW IF VITALI, CAN BE CALLED GREAT. TYSON BEAT A PRIME UNDEFEATED SPINKS AND HOLYFIELD BEAT A PRIME UNDEFEATED BOWE. WHO HAS LEWIS EVER TRULY BEATEN IN THAT CATEGORY? HE BEAT BOWE IN THE OLYMPICS WHEN THE REF STOPPED THE FIGHT ON ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. BOWE SHOOK LEWIS MORE IN THE FIRST ROUND THAN BOWE WAS SHOOK IN THE SECOND. LEWIS WAS A GREAT FIGHTER BUT NOT THE BEST OF AN ERA WITH TYSON AND HOLYFIELD.
Do you understand this. Do i have to put it in caps for all you English people to understand these simple truths?? I want to respect your opinions because some of you seem to have a decent boxing acumen, but you only see it one way because of your obssesion with your countries fighters. JUST BE OBJECTIVE OKAY.